West Virginia is second only to Wyoming in both coal production and President Trump’s winning vote percentage in the 2016 general election. So it was no surprise that Trump flew to the Mountain State on Tuesday to stump for his new plan to boost coal-fired power plants by cutting regulations on planet-warming carbon emissions.

“We love clean, beautiful West Virginia coal,” Trump told supporters at the Charleston Civic Center, while mocking renewable energy and natural gas, which have displaced coal in electric utilities across the US. “We love [coal]," he said. "You know, it’s indestructible stuff. In times of war, in times of conflict, you can blow up those windmills. They fall down real quick. You can blow up those pipelines real quick. You can do a lot of things to those solar panels, but you know what you can’t hurt, coal. You can do whatever you want to coal.”

Trump’s new power plant proposal—released by the EPA on Tuesday—would give states more leeway in regulating carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, and allow older coal plants to keep running. Administration officials say the plan will result in both more carbon dioxide emissions and more air pollution. It would also hit West Virginians the hardest when it comes to the effects of toxic air pollution from those very same coal plants. That’s according to a risk analysis by Trump's own EPA released Tuesday.

On page 176 of the 289-page document, EPA officials assembled a colored map of the United States showing the number of deaths per 100,000 people due to respiratory ailments from tiny particles of soot (also known as particulate matter, or pm-2.5). Under four scenarios of increased coal-fired electricity production under the new plan, West Virginia is shaded in the darkest red. That indicates it is the epicenter for the highest number of additional deaths from particulate and ozone pollution in the United States. Southwest Pennsylvania and parts of the upper Ohio Valley—regions of both coal mining and coal-fired electricity—are in the next-reddest group for additional deaths.

Nationwide, the EPA analysis states that the increase in coal burning under the Trump plan would result in an additional 470 to 1,400 premature deaths each year by 2030 due to respiratory ailments.

In comparison, the Obama administration’s 2015 Clean Power Plan would have saved 1,500 to 3,600 premature air pollution deaths annually by 2030. The new White House proposal would replace the Obama rules, which were blocked by the Supreme Court in 2016 after lawsuits argued that the Obama plan was too restrictive and would cause electricity prices to rise. The Obama plan was in legal limbo until the White House announced it was replacing it.

Critics say the Trump plan will do nothing to help slow the effects of climate warming, and will allow some utilities to spew out more harmful air pollution. “This is absolutely a rollback that will result in more pollution,” said Benjamin Longstreth, deputy director for federal policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group that opposes the new EPA plan.

EPA officials said the new power plant rules would allow each state to set its own emissions-reduction goals by using energy-efficiency technologies at each plant. The states would have to pick from a set of approved EPA-approved technologies, and each state's emissions plan would need final approval from EPA officials in Washington. The EPA analysis estimates that under the Trump plan, greenhouse gas emissions would be 3 percent higher than under the Obama regulations.

EPA director of the office of air quality William Wehrum, an attorney for coal, energy and manufacturing companies until he joined the agency, drafted the new Trump plan.

“Every power plant is a bit different,” Wehrum told reporters during a conference call on Tuesday. “What our program would do is to set standards that are tailored to the facility.” Wehrum said that the EPA will regulate the potential public health impacts using existing clean air laws rather than forcing power plants to burn less coal that produce pollutants.

“What we are dealing with is greenhouse gases, we are not dealing with sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxide or pm2.5,” he said. “We have abundant legal authority to deal with those other pollutants. If we want to regulate pm, we regulate pm straight up.”

In addition to carbon dioxide, which is the major greenhouse gas, burning coal produces sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, mercury, and dozens of toxic chemicals that are linked to human health effects.

Nitrogen oxides and particulates combine with sunlight to form smog, which causes respiratory ailments in both children, the elderly and those with compromised immune systems, for example. Mercury escapes from coal-burning power plants into the atmosphere, returns to the ground in the form of rain and is washed into streams and water bodies. Mercury then accumulates in fish, and moves up the food chain where it poses neurological health risks to pregnant women and children who eat the fish, according to the EPA website.

Coal-burning power plants account for 42 percent of all sources of mercury in the US, the EPA says. But when it comes to US energy, coal has been a big loser for the past decade. The one-two punch of cheaper natural gas and power from solar farms and wind turbines has cut the amount of coal-fired electricity powering US homes from 50 percent in 2008 to 30 percent in 2013.

That big drop was the result of cheaper natural gas and renewables, not more environmental regulations, according to a May 2018 study in the American Economic Journal by Harrison Fell, associate professor of agriculture and resource economist at North Carolina State University, and his colleague Daniel Kaffine, a University of Colorado Boulder associate professor in economics.

Fell says that the same market forces are continuing to push coal out of the US energy stream. He believes the new EPA power plant proposal might prolong the agony for some coal miners and coal producing areas, but it won’t change the equation for utilities that have cheaper alternatives. “I doubt you will see a massive reinvestment in coal-fired generation,” Fell said. “It’s not going to lead to a whole bunch of new coal plants, but it will stave off retirement of some of them.”

One bit of good news for those West Virginia miners: Even though the state's coal production is expected to continue dropping through 2030, according to a new study by West Virginia University, exports to coal-hungry India, Ukraine, and Brazil might keep some of them working.


More Great WIRED Stories

543 COMMENTS

  1. At this time it appears like Drupal is the preferred blogging platform out there right now.
    (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using on your blog?

  2. Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and
    you are just too magnificent. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it.
    You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart.

    I can not wait to read far more from you. This is
    actually a great website.

  3. Excellent blog you have got here.. It’s difficult to find quality writing like yours nowadays.

    I seriously appreciate individuals like you!
    Take care!! cheap flights 34pIoq5

  4. I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the page layout of your site?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could
    a little more in the way of content so people could connect with
    it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 images.

    Maybe you could space it out better?

  5. I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the layout of your blog?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect
    with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or two images.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  6. Hmm it appears like your blog ate my first comment (it was super long)
    so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say,
    I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well
    am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new
    to everything. Do you have any tips and hints for inexperienced blog writers?
    I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  7. I am really impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog.
    Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?

    Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it is rare
    to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.

  8. Great blog here! Also your web site loads up fast!
    What host are you using? Can I get your
    affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site
    loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  9. Excellent blog right here! Additionally your site lots up fast!
    What web host are you the usage of? Can I am getting your affiliate link for your host?
    I desire my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  10. Please let me know if you’re looking for a article author for your site.
    You have some really great posts and I think I would be
    a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really
    like to write some content for your blog in exchange for
    a link back to mine. Please blast me an email if interested.
    Many thanks!

  11. Thanks for some other excellent article. Where else may anybody get that type of info in such
    a perfect manner of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the look for such information.

  12. This design is wicked! You certainly know how to keep a reader
    entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Fantastic job.
    I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you
    presented it. Too cool!

  13. whoah this weblog is magnificent i love reading your
    articles. Keep up the great work! You realize,
    lots of persons are looking round for this information, you can aid them greatly.

  14. We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
    Your site provided us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done a
    formidable job and our entire community will be thankful to you.

  15. Taxi moto line
    128 Rue la Boétie
    75008 Paris
    +33 6 51 612 712  

    Taxi moto paris

    Aw, this was an exceptionally good post. Finding the
    time and actual effort to produce a top notch article… but what can I say… I procrastinate
    a whole lot and don’t seem to get anything done.

  16. Does Clomid take down estrogen levels? As an anti-estrogen exchange for on cycle steroid play, buy clomid online is objectively effective at staving wrong gynecomastia. It will-power not reduce estrogen levels or inhibit the aromatization modify, but in varied cases, binding to the receptors is enough protection for various men.

  17. The road seemed to stretch on endlessly before us, but Alexis assured me that our journey was near an end. We’d turn before long into thick woods and travel through narrow, winding roads until we reached her family’s cabin. I had no choice but to trust her as GPS had given out nearly 20 minutes ago.

    “There’s good wifi and okay reception at the cabin,” she’d told me, “but you can’t get there unless you know the way.”
    https://rentry.co/mm6mh
    So here I was, driving alone in the middle of god knows where with a girl who was my student just a couple of weeks ago. Her and her four best friends had been together from first grade all the way through high school and now they had graduated with very different futures ahead of them. They had decided to kick off “the best summer ever” with a week long stay at Alexis’s family cabin. Alexis and I were heading up before everyone else, the four other girls and four guys.

  18. Thank you for another great post. Where else could anybody get that type of information in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here