His belief that the nation state can cure economic ills is not without merit, says Guardian columnist Larry Elliott

Once every three years the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank hold their annual meetings out of town. Instead of schlepping over to Washington, the gathering of finance ministers and central bank governors is hosted by a member state. Ever since the 2000 meeting in Prague was besieged by anti-globalisation rioters, the away fixtures have tended to be held in places that are hard to get to or where the regime tends to take a dim view of protest: Singapore, Turkey, Peru.

This years meeting will take place in a couple of weeks on the Indonesian island of Bali, where the IMF and the World Bank can be reasonably confident that the meetings will not be disrupted. At least not from the outside. The real threat no longer comes from balaclava-wearing anarchists throwing Molotov cocktails but from within. Donald Trump is now the one throwing the petrol bombs and for multilateral organisations like the IMF and World Bank, that poses a much bigger threat.

The US president put it this way in his speech to the United Nations on Tuesday: We reject the ideology of globalism and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism. For decades, the message from the IMF has been that breaking down the barriers to trade, allowing capital to move unhindered across borders and constraining the ability of governments to regulate multinational corporations was the way to prosperity. Now the most powerful man on the planet is saying something different: that the only way to remedy the economic and social ills caused by globalisation is through the nation state. Trumps speech was mocked by fellow world leaders, but the truth is that hes not a lone voice.

The worlds other big economic superpower China has never given up on the nation state. Xi Jinping likes to use the language of globalisation to make a contrast with Trumps protectionism, but the stupendous growth posted by China over the past four decades has been the result of doing the opposite of what the globalisation textbooks recommend. The measures traditionally frowned upon by the IMF state-run industries, subsidies, capital controls have been central to Beijings managed capitalism. China has certainly not closed itself off from the global economy but has engaged on its own terms. When the communist regime wanted to move people out of the fields and into factories it did so through the mechanism of an undervalued currency, which made Chinese exports highly competitive. When the party decided that it wanted to move into more sophisticated, higher-tech manufacturing, it insisted that foreign companies wishing to invest in China share their intellectual property.

This sort of approach isnt new. It was the way most western countries operated in the decades after the second world war, when capital controls, managed immigration and a cautious approach to removing trade barriers were seen as necessary if governments were to meet public demands for full employment and rising living standards. The US and the EU now say that China is not playing fair because it has been prospering with an economic strategy that is supposed not to work. There is some irony in this.

The idea that the nation state would wither away was based on three separate arguments. The first was that the barriers to the global free movement of goods, services, people and money were economically inefficient and that removing them would lead to higher levels of growth. This has not been the case. Growth has been weaker and less evenly shared.

The second was that governments couldnt resist globalisation even if they wanted to. This was broadly the view once adopted by Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, and now kept alive by Emmanuel Macron. The message to displaced workers was that the power of the market was rather like a hurricane or a blizzard an irresistible force of nature. This has always been a dubious argument because there is no such thing as a pure free market. Globalisation has been shaped by political decisions, which for the past four decades have favoured the interests of capital over labour.

Finally, it was argued that the trans-national nature of modern capitalism made the nation state obsolete. Put simply, if economics was increasingly global then politics had to go global, too. There is clearly something in this because financial markets impose constraints on individual governments and it would be preferable for there to be a form of global governance pushing for stability and prosperity for all. The problem is that to the extent such an institutional mechanism exists, it has been captured by the globalists. That is as true of the EU as it is of the IMF.

So while the nation state is far from perfect, it is where an alternative to the current failed model will inevitably begin. Increasingly, voters are looking to the one form of government where they do have a say to provide economic security. And if the mainstream parties are not prepared to offer what these voters want a decently paid job, properly funded public services and controls on immigration then they will look elsewhere for parties or movements that will. This has proved to be a particular problem for the parties of the centre left the Democrats in the US, New Labour in Britain, the SDP in Germany that signed up to the idea that globalisation was an unstoppable force.

Jeremy Corbyn certainly does not accept the idea that the state is obsolete as an economic actor. The plan is to build a different sort of economy from the bottom up locally and nationally. Thats not going to be easy but beats the current, failed, top-down approach.

Larry Elliott is the Guardians economics editor

28 COMMENTS

  1. This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.
    I’ve joined your rss feed and sit up for in search of more of your
    wonderful post. Additionally, I’ve shared your site in my social networks

  2. Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having problems locating
    it but, I’d like to shoot you an email. I’ve got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing.
    Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

  3. A fascinating discussion is definitely worth comment.
    I do think that you ought to publish more on this topic,
    it might not be a taboo subject but typically people do
    not speak about such issues. To the next!
    Kind regards!!

  4. Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using?

    I’m planning to start my own blog soon but
    I’m having a difficult time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique.

    P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!

  5. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more
    than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and everything.

    However think about if you added some great visuals or video
    clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and clips, this website could certainly be one of the most beneficial in its niche.
    Very good blog!

  6. 大部份曾經生育或經歷更年期的女性都會面臨私密深處及外觀鬆弛問題,不單會影響自信心和伴侶的親密體驗,更有機會造成容易積菌及尿滲等健康問題。全港首部 Venus Fiore閨密儀 RF射頻 私密緊緻療程 專門針對私密各處包括陰道、陰唇及陰阜的專用治療頭,全面改善鬆弛問題;每個治療頭均採用一次性即棄治療蓋,確保衛生。還有ATC自動控溫綜合系統,讓療程的治療溫度被有效監控,療程自然更安全、更有效達至預期效果。全港首部 Venus Fiore閨密儀 RF射頻 私密緊緻療程Venus Fiore集中為女性私密之處提供最到位的呵護,專注重整陰道健康、收緊鬆弛陰唇和改善陰阜肥大問題。關鍵在於Venus Concept的王牌─糅合多極射頻與磁力脈衝的(MP)2磁頻專利技術,發揮提升細胞活躍度、重塑同時增加膠原蛋白、刺激毛細血管新生等作用,達至調整陰道濕潤度、pH值的效果,更重要的是顯著改善陰道彈性,使其回復年輕狀態。

  7. What you typed was very logical. However, consider this, what if you typed a catchier post title?

    I am not suggesting your information is not solid., however what if you added something to possibly get people’s attention? I mean The truth is that Trump has a point about globalisation | Larry Elliott | FBW is kinda vanilla.
    You could peek at Yahoo’s front page and see how they create article titles to grab viewers interested.
    You might try adding a video or a pic or two to get people excited about everything’ve got to say.
    In my opinion, it might bring your blog a little livelier.

  8. Can I just say what a reduction to find someone who actually knows what theyre speaking about on the internet. You positively know learn how to carry a difficulty to light and make it important. Extra people must learn this and perceive this side of the story. I cant imagine youre not more common since you undoubtedly have the gift.

  9. Oh my goodness! a tremendous article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting similar rss drawback? Anybody who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx

  10. The free transfer from Shakhtar Donetsk is seen as a coup for Goodison Park manager Marco Silva, whose personal intervention reportedly swung the deal Everton’s way. Bernard passnotes: Who is the 25-year-old Brazilian set to join Everton on a free transfer and where will he fit into Marco Silva’s side this season?

  11. Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It actually used to be a entertainment
    account it. Glance complex to far added agreeable from you!
    By the way, how could we keep up a correspondence?

  12. Very good blog! Do you have any helpful hints for aspiring writers?
    I’m planning to start my own blog soon but I’m a
    little lost on everything. Would you advise starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many
    options out there that I’m completely overwhelmed ..
    Any tips? Kudos!

  13. Can I just say what a reduction to find someone who actually knows what theyre speaking about on the internet. You positively know learn how to carry a difficulty to light and make it important. Extra people must learn this and perceive this side of the story. I cant imagine youre not more common since you undoubtedly have the gift.

  14. There are some interesting points in time in this article however I don’t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There’s some validity but I will take maintain opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like more! Added to FeedBurner as nicely

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here